
The Science of Successful Organizational Change
This week Steven dives into Part 1 of Paul Gibbons’ book The Science of Successful Organizational Change. In today’s entry, we cover the introduction to Part 1 in which Gibbon’s tells us that we live in a world of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) and in Chapter 2, that we have to transition from change fragility to change-agility. Remember to use the link in the essay to buy a copy of the book to support the author, the podcast, and the blog! – Tom
Week 4…
It is a VUCA world for the week-4 re-read of Paul Gibbons book “The Science of Successful Organizational Change” (get your copy), as we look at the Part I introduction to Change-Agility and chapter 2 “From Change Fragility to Change-Agility”.
Part I Introduction to Change-Agility
We are living in a business world of Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA). However, Gibbons points out every generation can relate to the VUCA concept due to the “availability bias” – overweighting what is in front of us (more about cognitive biases in chapter 5).
Gibbons tells what is special about how we perceive VUCA in our time is based on “information speed and volume”. Gibbons concept of change-agility can help us respond to the challenges presented in a VUCA world. On page 39, Gibbons outlines six characteristics that are the goals of a change-agile organization.
- Business structures look a like portfolio of change programs
- The ability to change is a competitive advantage.
- Businesses are antifragile – they are strengthened by the change.
- Dynamic flow – change, knowledge, and information move both bottom-up and top-down directions.
- Business is operationally adaptable – becoming the disruptor.
- Resistance-to-change no longer inhibits change because change is part of the culture.
This book will help the reader understand how-to get closer to these six idealist goals. The one key idea to keep in mind, the change should no-longer be considered episodic, but continuous – always happening within and outside an organization.
Chapter 2 – “From Change Fragility to Change-Agility
Antifragile
Change-Agility is the central concept of Chapter 2. When Gibbons uses the word agile, he means business agility or business adaptation. Gibbons is not referring to the specific Agile practices and ideas we read about in software development.
Gibbons starts chapter 2 explaining Nassim Taleb’s Antifragile concept. All organization structures fall somewhere on the continuum between fragile – robust — antifragile. Fragile organizations crumble when asked to change while antifragile organizations prosper under stress, not just survive.
The Systemic, Change-Agility Model
Gibbons describes his holistic, systemic change-agility model (page 43); in order for change to-be sustainable, all four element-areas must reinforce each other.
- Mindsets and beliefs
- Behaviors, skills, performance,
- Processes, structures, strategy
- Culture, climate, relationships
“The insight that businesses are complex systems that only change as fast the weakest link is not radically new; it is, however, radically ignored.” (page 44). Meaning, pay attention to all four element-areas in this model to become successful with change.
mindsets
Mindsets: what is the right change mindset? Referencing change guru John Kotter (see https://tcagley.wordpress.com/2014/11/08/re-read-saturday-leading-change-john-p-kotter/), it is the “get-to” change rather than “have-to” change mindset. Coupled with a strong team mindset, “we” over “me”.
Gibbons references Carol Dweck’s Growth Mindset / Fixed Mindset model, which we are already familiar with from a previous re-read – https://tcagley.wordpress.com/2017/01/14/mindset-the-new-psychology-of-success-reviews-carol-s-dweck-ph-d-re-read-week-1-basics-and-introduction/
Learning Agility Dimensions
Gibbons goes into Korn Ferry’s Learning Agility Dimensions (page 48),
describing the 5 dimensions to this model.
- Mental Agility
- People Agility
- Change Agility
- Results Agility
- Self-Awareness
Gibbons assertion is change-agile organizations need more Growers over Knowers (growers actively seek out knowledge and change while knowers are biased to protect their expertise). People who have spent their career in information technologies can relate to this idea.
Culture and Climate of Innovation
CULTURE is the elephant in the room because culture is the hardest thing to change, by far! The failure rates of culture change projects verify this.
“When I have seen culture-change succeed, it is when culture change focused on changing a very specific and tangible aspects of top team behavior and then cascaded those downward.” (page 50)
The culture of innovation is very important for change-agile organizations. Gibbons references Goran Ekvall “Climate of Innovation” framework (page 56), that can help assess the organization’s ability to support innovation.
Resources
- Challenge
- Idea Time
- Idea Support
Safety
- Trust and Openness
- Playfulness
- Conflict levels
Curiosity
- Debates
- Freedom
- Risk-taking
It is one thing to talk innovation (what company does not) and another to become an innovative organization.
Agile Structures
Gibbons also addresses Agile Structures – beyond the organizational hierarchy, briefly describing
- Hierarchies – we know these – most corporations
- Project-Based Business – the movie industry
- Self-Managed Work Teams (SMWT) – agile development (e.g., scrum) strives for this
- Holacracy (https://tcagley.wordpress.com/2017/04/08/holacracy-re-read-week-one-logistics-and-introduction/)\ – Zappos
Summary
Part I of this book consisted of just one chapter – Chapter 2. And Chapter 2 is a goldmine of ideas.
Chapter 2 references THREE previous re-read books (Kotter, Dweck, and Robertson). We are introduced to Gibbons holistic, systemic change-agility model (4 reinforcing areas). Plus, Korn Ferry’s Agile Learning Dimensions model and Goran Ekvall Climate of Innovation framework.
Because of the breadth found in Chapter 2, I left out other topics discussed in Chapter 2 in this re-read blog post. Question: what topic covered in Chapter 2 did you find most interesting and new
Or was the VUCA world described in the Part I Introduction the most useful for you?
Previous entries in the re-read of the book The Science of Successful Organizational Change(buy a copy!)
July 30, 2017 at 1:54 pm
When I read the introduction to Part 1 of The Science of Successful Organizational Change, I was struck by the statement that every generation thinks it faces unique circumstances and unique levels of change. This perception is driven by a type of cognitive bias call an availability bias. An availability bias overweighs evidence or events that are current over evidence or events we have encountered in the past. If we push aside the availability bias then perhaps the changes we are facing in the early in the 21st can be informed by data and evidence from the past. Later in Chapter 2, Gibbons comes back to busting the availability bias by reminding the reader that to embrace change-agility we need to be willing to learn from experience and apply the lesson we learn.
Change is survived by organizations that are antifragile by nature or can shift from fragile to anti-fragile ( a concept introduced by Nassim Nicholas Taleb). Organizations that are antifragile thrive on change and use their ability to embrace change as a competitive advantage. Part of becoming change-agile requires embracing innovation in both words and culture. One powerful tool used to create and transmit culture is storytelling. The big gotcha is that the stories an organization tell need to match the culture and behavior. The whole concept of being antifragile which Gibbons enables using the concept of change-agility requires more than mission statements and enabling stories I enjoyed the comment that if all it took to engage change-agility was mission statements and origin stories every firm would be a Google, Amazon or Apple. As Steven notes in his re-read of Chapter 2 there are lots of dimensions that need to be addressed to leverage change-agility to be antifragile. Gibbons point that thinking or focusing on a single dimension is reductionist. As a change practitioner, the reminder that the path to antifragile requires more than changing one or a few organizational attributes is a wakeup call.
July 30, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
July 30, 2017 at 10:02 pm
It is hard to think of too many examples of organizations that have moved past “robust” to “antifragile”, and seems to be immune to distribution — Amazon comes to mind.
August 5, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 6, 2017 at 9:10 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 12, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 13, 2017 at 9:16 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 19, 2017 at 11:55 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 20, 2017 at 9:16 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 26, 2017 at 11:55 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
August 27, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 2, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 3, 2017 at 9:10 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 9, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 10, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 16, 2017 at 11:57 pm
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 17, 2017 at 9:15 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 24, 2017 at 12:45 am
[…] Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility […]
September 24, 2017 at 9:10 pm
[…] Week 4: Introduction to Part 1 and Fragility to Change-Agility […]