
The Science of Successful Organizational Change
This week Steven dives into Chapter 4 of Paul Gibbons’ book The Science of Successful Organizational Change. This chapter has provided me several sleepless nights considering the difference complicated and complex systems. Understanding the difference is important making change happen, stick and work! Remember to use the link in the essay to buy a copy of the book to support the author, the podcast, and the blog! – Tom
Week 6 —
Welcome to week-6 of the re-read of Paul Gibbons book “The Science of Successful Organizational Change” (get your copy). We tackle the C and A in VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) this week.
Chapter 4 – Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments
Complex environments require different decision-making tools than complicated environments.
Gibbons references David Snowden (Welsh scholar) classification of systems …
- Simple
- Complicated
- Complex
- Chaotic
Snowden’s Cynefin Framework is well worth knowing, defining these four types of systems and how your approach should differ within each system. The Cynefin Framework also includes a “Disorder” section. “Disorder” acknowledges the fact that you may need to do some analysis to figure-out if the system in question should be classified as Simple, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic or some combination of these four classifications.
Complexity
Gibbons focuses on Complex Systems in chapter 4. Complex systems are defined as having three characteristics:
- Multiplicity, there are many moving parts, which describes a Complex system in the Cynefin Framework
- Nonlinear (e.g., exponential, logarithmic, cyclical, random, …) In nonlinear systesms, the input and the output are not linearly related.
- Emergent – “behaviors that arise out of more fundamental entities and yet are novel or irreducible with respect to them” (p. 104) – examples include the game of poker, bird flight formations, …)
Gibbons provides an insightful quote from Donella Meadows
“To really understand a [complex] system, you have to try to change it” (p. 107)
and to start to understand complex systems requires learning by hypothesis, experiments, data gathering, and evaluation.
Systems Thinking
Gibbons tool 1 is the Cynefin Framework with the focus on Complex Systems
and tool 2 is Systems Thinking.
Systems thinking, lean-management style uses value stream mapping to help us visualize the bigger picture and understand the workflow.
Systems thinking in software development becomes understood better by developing the end-to-end view, with a warning from Kent Beck [Extreme Programming Explained, another book in the re-read series – https://tcagley.wordpress.com/2016/06/18/re-read-saturday-extreme-programming-explained-embrace-change-second-edition-week-1/%5D – “End-to-end is further than you think”.
“We need systems thinking more than ever because connectivity and complexity make it hard to understand cause and effect.” Peter Senge (p.109)
Gibbons provides three example diagrams to help us visualize systems thinking:
- The S-Curve (p. 112) – the 3-phases in a typical business life cycle
- Infancy
- Expansion
- Maturity
- The Fixes that Fail Archetype (p.113) – changes that produce unintended, negative consequences – fixes that make things worse.
- Project Overwhelm (p. 114) – visualizes “why things do not change despite our best efforts” a diagram every project manager can relate to and should study.
Gibbons explains why visualizing the system is so important:
“Frequently, the greatest benefit the team derives from creating these [system] diagrams is sharing views of the problem, discussing cause-and-effect business drivers, challenging assumptions, unearthing important missed variables, developing shared understanding of dynamics, enabling team learning, and building consensus around a solution.” (p.114)
Ambiguity and Analytics
Gibbons pivots from Complexity to Big Data and Analytics because “executives face a deluge of data and the problem is not lack of data, but rather distinguishing the signal from the noise” (p. 115)
Data is everywhere, or at-least the potential for data is everywhere
“There is now a computer in the me of most economic transactions.” Hal Varian (p. 116)
Gibbons sees Big Data as a radical change from where analytics and decision making has been because of 4 factors:
- Volume
- Velocity
- Variety
- Required Tools
And then lists several applications where Big Data is used:
- Price optimizations
- Customer intimacy
- Contract compliance
- Customer service improvements
- Predictive analytics
- Customer targeting
- Business process improvements
Gibbons presents a knowledge hierarchy:
Data -> Information -> Insight -> Wisdom
- Data gathering
- Data is structured into information
- Information turned into insights through both human expertise and artificial intelligence
- Insights drive action after human judgment/wisdom determine what insights are likely to-be the most beneficial for an organization at this time
The business trend is to address ambiguity with Big Data applications.
Summary of Chapter 4
Gibbons discusses the C and A of VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity)
There are two tools to help us understand the complex systems we work with.
- David Snowden’s Cynefin Framework
- Systems Thinking
Ambiguity, and better decisions is increasingly being solved through Big Data.
Previous entries in the re-read of the book The Science of Successful Organizational Change(buy a copy!)
Week 4: Change Fragility to Change-Agility
Week 5: Governance and the Psychology of Risk
August 13, 2017 at 9:16 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
August 14, 2017 at 11:29 am
The distinction between complicated and complex is not merely an academic discussion. As noted, complicated processes are comprised of multiple moving parts but just because something is complicated does not make it complex. I had a discussion on plating meals (putting all of the food on a plate in an appealing manner) for a wedding party with a chef recently. The process had a large number of steps but as the chef pointed out, the number of steps in the process did not make the process complex. Reflecting on this chapter, the process lacked the two other components of a complex system (nonlinearity and emergent behavior). It is easy to confuse complicated and complex systems, confusing the two can lead to the wrong response and potentially adverse outcomes if you are trying to change or improve the process
Software centric work is rarely simply a complicated process, there are too many chaotic people involved and too much discovery required to deliver value. The big gotcha is that many process improvements focus on constraints as a tool to elicit improved productivity and efficiency. Constraints are often used (and are useful) to keep complicated processes on course but if the process you are addressing is complex, constraints alone may not have the desired outcome over the long term. During the 1990’s many process improvement programs helped organizations codify and harden their software lifecycles without regard to nonlinearity and emergent behavior. In the short run teams and organizations saw improvement from using constraints alone. However, in the long run, the outcome was that very little improvement occurred and more disturbingly, time-to-market slowed, costs increased and projects still failed (this could have been influenced by interaction with other complex systems).
Agile and the concepts of experimentation, failing fast and learning combined with the knowledge of the distinction between complicated and complex systems provide hope that change can improve the delivery of value inside and outside the organization. We recognize that we work in a larger system that is not just complicated and complex but sometimes chaotic. Change requires many approaches and tools!
August 19, 2017 at 11:55 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
August 20, 2017 at 9:16 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
August 26, 2017 at 11:55 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
August 27, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 2, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 3, 2017 at 9:10 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 5, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Gibbons, in his book The Science of Successful Organizational Change (See Chapter 4, Page 104 or SPaMCAST Re-read), defines complexity as being comprised of three […]
September 9, 2017 at 11:56 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 10, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 16, 2017 at 11:57 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 17, 2017 at 9:16 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 24, 2017 at 12:45 am
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]
September 24, 2017 at 9:11 pm
[…] Week 6: Decision Making in Complex and Ambiguous Environments […]